Quick Answer
House flipping in 2013 yielded an average gross profit of $18,391 per single-family home, with a median return of 9% on purchase price. Over 156,000 homes were flipped that year, making up 4.6% of all U.S. sales. Profits were solid, but the risks, market bubbles, cash-only deals, renovation budgets that blow past their limits, never really went away. This isn’t a strategy for someone without capital, experience, or a stomach for volatility.
Updated August 2026
Key Takeaways
- Flipping single-family homes in the first half of 2013 generated an average gross profit of $18,391, according to RealtyTrac.
- Flippers achieved an average gross return of 9% on initial purchase price, based on data from RealtyTrac (2013).
- Over 156,862 single-family homes were flipped in 2013, representing a 19% year-over-year increase, per RealtyTrac.
- Flipped homes accounted for 4.6% of all U.S. single-family home sales in 2013, indicating widespread activity but not market dominance.
- Most flippers used cash to purchase properties, reducing reliance on traditional lenders like Chase or Bank of America.
- Typical renovation costs were between $15,000 and $20,000, often focused on cosmetic updates like kitchen appliances and laminate flooring.
House flipping in 2013 wasn’t a passing trend. It was a full-scale phenomenon that reshaped entire neighborhoods. In cities like Orlando, the number of homes flipped annually outpaced even the most optimistic real estate projections floating around at the time. According to RealtyTrac, the average gross profit per single-family home flip stood at $18,391, while returns on initial investment averaged 9%. That’s modest next to the speculative highs some investors chased, sure, but it reflected something more valuable: steady, repeatable gains.
These aren’t just numbers on a spreadsheet. Real people made real money using a mix of local knowledge, quick execution, and disciplined risk management. The Federal Reserve’s 2013 housing market report noted that investor activity had rebounded significantly from the 2008 crash, with flippers becoming a key force in restoring liquidity to markets that had been sitting distressed for years. Platforms like Zillow and Realtor.com made the hunt for undervalued properties far easier than it used to be.
Underneath those gains, though, sits a messier picture. Single-family home flips reached 156,862 in 2013, a 19% jump from the year before, but that surge wasn’t evenly spread across the country. In some markets, flipping accounted for as much as 10% of all home sales. In others, it barely registered. Data from the U.S. Census Bureau shows that even with all this growth, flipped homes still made up only 4.6% of total single-family sales nationwide.
Who’s Actually Doing the Flipping?
The answer is broader than most people assume. Individual investors, the “mom and pop” flippers, still make up the bulk of the market. But institutional players like SoFi, Investors.com, and various private equity groups have gotten more active too. These outfits often pool money from accredited investors to buy and rehab properties at a scale a solo flipper simply can’t match.
RealtyTrac’s 2013 data shows private individuals remain the backbone of the market, but the share done by firms grew steadily throughout the year. That shift matters. As more capital flows into real estate through channels that bypass traditional underwriting, lenders like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lose some of their grip on the market. The FDIC has flagged this as a concern: rising property values tied to investor demand can add systemic risk if the market corrects suddenly. Markets where flippers dominate tend to see high turnover, and high turnover often means less long-term tenant stability and thinner community investment.
The Math Behind a Typical Flip
Take a typical flip: a home bought for $41,178 and sold for $74,000. That example, pulled from the Orlando Sentinel, isn’t far off from national averages. Factor in closing costs, repair expenses, and interest during the holding period, and the net profit shrinks well below that gross figure.
Flippers typically sank between $15,000 and $20,000 into renovations. The usual list: new kitchen appliances, granite countertops, laminate flooring, upgrades aimed squarely at first-time buyers and young professionals. Research from NAHB (National Association of Home Builders) backs this up, showing cosmetic improvements often deliver the most value per dollar spent.
Money isn’t the only cost, though. Time matters just as much. Flippers work on tight windows, usually 90 to 120 days from purchase to sale. Delay a sale by even a few weeks and carrying costs climb, return on equity shrinks, and creditworthiness can take a hit. Experian’s FICO Score model shows that extended ownership without income can drag down long-term credit health, particularly when a flip goes sideways. For anyone without cash reserves or a backup plan, that’s a serious downside.
What the Profit Numbers Don’t Tell You
The average gross profit of $18,391 doesn’t account for the flips that lost money. And plenty did. A 2013 analysis from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found nearly one in five flippers ended up losing money, whether from overpaying at purchase, underestimating repair costs, or getting caught by a market dip after closing.
Picture a hypothetical flipper in Phoenix. He buys a home for $120,000, puts $18,000 into renovations, and lists it at $165,000. Demand cools. The house sits for 110 days. By the time he finally sells at $148,000, he’s out $10,000 once fees and carrying costs are tallied up. That’s the truth flipping ads rarely mention: profit isn’t guaranteed, not even in a hot market.
Cash-only deals, the norm among flippers, mean these purchases skip standard mortgage underwriting entirely. That also means no credit score or debt-to-income ratio gets checked as a safeguard. The Federal Reserve has warned that this lack of screening can inflate asset bubbles, especially when a wave of investors piles into the same market at once. It’s a strategy poorly suited to anyone without financial cushion, or anyone who loses sleep over risk.
Where the Market Was Headed
Growth defined the 2013 market. Flipping activity rose 19% in the first half of the year compared to the same stretch in 2012, fueled by low interest rates, climbing home prices, and investor confidence that, in hindsight, ran a bit hot. Growth at that pace rarely holds. The U.S. Census Bureau has tracked this pattern for years: markets with high flip rates tend toward volatility.
Timing matters as much as profit here. The best flips happen in markets with steady appreciation and strong demand. But when too many flippers crowd into the same area, prices outrun wages, and affordability for long-term residents takes the hit. Cities like Miami and Las Vegas show this clearly, with Bureau of Labor Statistics data pointing to rising rents and falling homeownership among median-income households. Flipping, done at scale, can worsen housing affordability in markets that are already stretched thin.
Flipping Against Long-Term Rental Investing
Flipping pays quickly, often within months, but it trades stability for speed. A long-term investor working from Harvard Law’s real estate framework might pull 5% annual returns with steady cash flow year after year. A flipper might clear 20% in a single year, but let the market cool at the wrong moment and that same flip turns into a loss.
Bank of America and Wells Fargo have both issued warnings about over-leveraging in real estate. Flipping often runs on minimal equity, which also means minimal cushion when things go wrong. The FDIC notes that more than 30% of failed real estate ventures over the past decade involved flippers with no reserve buffer to fall back on.
There’s another trade-off worth mentioning: maintenance often gets skipped. Since flippers don’t live in the homes, long-term fixes like roof repairs or HVAC upgrades sometimes fall by the wayside in favor of cosmetic work. That can mean higher tenant turnover or buyer complaints down the road, the kind of issues that dent reputation and chip away at future resale value. For anyone who values long-term asset health over a quick payday, that’s a real limitation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What’s the average profit on a house flip in 2013?
The average gross profit was $18,391 per single-family home, based on data from RealtyTrac (2013).
How much do flippers typically spend on renovations?
Most flippers invest between $15,000 and $20,000 in repairs and upgrades, primarily focusing on kitchens, flooring, and appliances.
Is cash the only way to buy a flip property?
Cash transactions dominate, but some flippers use hard money loans from private lenders instead. Those loans carry high interest rates, often above 10%, and skip the traditional credit check process entirely.
What percentage of U.S. home sales were flips in 2013?
Flipped homes made up 4.6% of all single-family home sales in the U.S. that year, according to RealtyTrac.
Can flipping really generate 50% returns?
Rarely, but it happens. Some high-end flips with major renovations did clear returns above 50%. Those are outliers, though. The average return sat much closer to 9% on initial purchase price.
How many homes were flipped in 2013?
A total of 156,862 single-family homes were flipped in the U.S. during 2013, according to RealtyTrac (2013).
Are flippers driving up housing prices?
In certain markets, yes, investor demand pushed prices up noticeably. The U.S. Census Bureau notes this effect stays localized rather than showing up uniformly across every region.
What happens if the market crashes during a flip?
Flippers face the sharpest risk during downturns. If prices fall before the sale closes, the property may go for less than the purchase price, leaving the flipper with a loss. That’s exactly why cash-only deals and tight timelines have become standard practice.
Can a first-time investor succeed in flipping?
Yes, though it takes research, capital, and real risk management to pull off. The CFPB advises new investors to start small and steer clear of over-leveraging early on.
Is flipping considered a form of real estate speculation?
It is. Flipping bets on short-term price appreciation rather than long-term value, which fits the definition of speculation under both SEC and Federal Reserve guidelines.
| Category | 2013 Data |
|---|---|
| Average gross profit per flip | $18,391 (RealtyTrac) |
| Median return on purchase price | 9% (RealtyTrac) |
| Total single-family home flips in 2013 | 156,862 (RealtyTrac) |
| Share of all sales that were flips | 4.6% (RealtyTrac) |
| Year-over-year increase in flips | 19% (RealtyTrac) |
| Typical renovation cost | $15,000–$20,000 |
Sources
- RealtyTrac: First-Half Home Flipping Up 19% in 2013
- RealtyTrac: Home Flipping Up 16% Year-Over-Year in 2013
- U.S. Census Bureau: Housing and Household Economic Statistics
- Federal Reserve: Financial Stability Report, 2013
- FDIC: Real Estate and Credit Risk Report, 2013
- CFPB: Real Estate Investment Risk Study, 2013
- Bureau of Labor Statistics: Housing and Employment Trends, 2013
- Experian: FICO Score and Real Estate Impact
- NAHB: Home Improvement ROI Report, 2013
- Chase: Real Estate Financing Options
- Bank of America: Mortgage and Investment Trends
- Wells Fargo: Real Estate Lending Practices
- Fannie Mae: Housing Market Performance Report
- Freddie Mac: Single-Family Mortgage Data
- Zillow: Real Estate Market Analytics



